The srcvol on srcfiler is 100GB in size and contains a qtree using 20 GB. WATLEANAS0001*> snapvault stop WATLEANAS0001:/vol/vol_remote2/watmanfps0001_d__ Stopping /vol/vol_remote2/watmanfps0001_d__ is permanent. I have deleted the share and removed the quota setting but not able to delete qtree...Showing the error:API failure for deleting the directory : /vol/vol1/COPY-EDITORS Reason : Directory not empty Please Updated on 2011-03-30T07:47:19Z at 2011-03-30T07:47:19Z by Redsnapperke brad_s 100000HRVH 1 Post Re: Removing snapvault source 2011-03-29T22:52:57Z This is the accepted answer. Source
Further incremental updates will be impossible. This is what happens when I try and convert it or nuke it: WATLEANAS0001*> snapvault convert WATLEANAS0001:/vol/vol_remote2/watmanfps0001_d__ Snapvault must be turned off to convert. Topic Forum Directory > dW > Eserver > Forum: IBM System Storage > Topic: Removing snapvault source 2 replies Latest Post - 2011-03-30T07:47:19Z by Redsnapperke Display:ConversationsBy Date 1-3 of 3 Previous Thank you in advance IBM6040N1:/vol/BOOTIVM/qt_BOOTIVM IBM6040N1:/vol/SV_BOOTIVM/qt_BOOTIVM_IBM6040N1 Source 682:29:50 Idle IBM6040N1> snapvault stop -f IBM6040N1:/vol/SV_BOOTIVM/qt_BOOTIVM_IBM6040N1 Could not delete qtree: destination qtree does not exist IBM6040N1> snapvault stop -f IBM6040N1:/vol/SV_BOOTIVM/qt_BOOTIVM_IBM6040N1 Could not delete http://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-ONTAP-Discussions/Snapvault-could-not-delete/td-p/18224
Therefore, it is important to consider the snapshot retention period and snapshot delta when sizing the destination volume for QSM relationships. Redsnapperke 270002JU1C 4 Posts Re: Removing snapvault source 2011-03-30T07:47:19Z This is the accepted answer. Cause of this problem For qtree snapmirror (QSM), it is possible that the destination filer's volume containing the destination qtree for a snapmirror relationship will require more space than the volume Here is the output of a snapvault -l of one of the destination qtrees: Snapvault secondary is ON.
In my case it was the older snap. 3) The redundant relationship should be gone - check using "snapvault status" More... Part No. 210-04225_A0 Updated for Data ONTAP 7.3.1 on 12 December 2008 The qtree is not a SnapVault qtree replica. brad_s 100000HRVH 2011-03-29T22:52:57Z I had the same problem - I removed the relationship from the secondary but it was still showing on the primary.
Greetings, We retired a SV primary volume and I need to keep the destination SV volume around until the snapshots age out. All rights reserved. Delete the one relating to the snapvault relationship you are trying to remove. find this To remove the unwanted snapvault relationship from the primary you have to remove the unwanted snapvault snap.
I've even rebooted the destination filer which would have the effect of stopping and starting snapvault. Hello folks. I had the same problem - I removed the relationship from the secondary but it was still showing on the primary. Thank you Have a nice day.
Solution Increase the size of the destination volume so that it can hold the sum of the following: The amount of data stored in the source qtree The amount of data Show: 10 25 50 100 items per page Previous Next Feed for this topic Netapp Wednesday, December 23, 2009 Qtree SnapMirror update states that file system is full Qtree SnapMirror update Do the following. 1) snap list "volume" - where volume is the volume on the primary. 2) Two of the snaps will have (snapvault) next to them when you list the I also did a snapvault release on the primary and a snapvault snap unsched on both primary and secondary.
Loading×Sorry to interruptCSS ErrorRefresh Share?Profiles ▼Communities ▼Apps ▼ Forums IBM System Storage Log in to participate Expanded section▼Topic Tags ? this contact form Last Updated:24 AUG 2006 Environment EnvironmentBookmark Data ONTAP All NetApp filer NearStore SnapMirror If you would like more help, please try the new NOWSupportCommunities where registered customers, partners, and NetApp technical Qtree SnapMirror update states that file system is... ► October (1) ► September (5) Subscribe To Netapp Posts Atom Posts Comments Atom Comments Netapp Related Videos Loading... I need to figure out how to clean these up.
Powered by Blogger. The primary shows no trace of the former relationship. Free forum by Nabble Edit this page Renaming a SnapVault or Open Systems SnapVault secondary volume SnapVault or Open Systems SnapVault updates do not work if a SnapVault or Open Systems have a peek here After I manually deleted the snapshots that were used as part of the nightly baseline, the old relationships went away.
Here is the little blighter: (the middle one) watleefps0001:d:\ WATLEANAS0001:/vol/vol_remote2/watleefps0001_d__ Snapvaulted 23:30:35 Idle - This may take a long time to complete. Volume-level snapshots independent of the QSM base snapshot (such as the nightly snapshots) can retain data in the QSM qtrees.Since the volume snapshots are unique to the destination filer, they may
This is the accepted answer. I did a snapvault stop on the destination which seems to have worked fine. QSM sends delete information for the files which have been deleted, and complete data for the newly created files. Log in to reply.
I need to remove a snapvault relations ship. Enter the following command:snapvault start -S pri_filer:pri_qtree sec_filer:sec_qtree Snapvault configuration for the qtree has been set. The secondary qtree will be deleted. Check This Out The backups are done via command line/cron/snapvault snap sched setups.
To remove the unwanted snapvault relationship from the primary you have to remove the unwanted snapvault snap. template. Hello, I have stopped a snapvault relation, but when I give the command snapvault status it is still visible as source. Enter the following command to verify whether the change was successful: snapvault update sec_qtree The output of snapvault status -c will contain entries referencing the old volume name in addition to
Delete the one relating to the snapvault relationship you are trying to remove. This is the accepted answer. Hello, Indeed that solved the issue. Login | Register For Free | Help Search this list this category for: (Advanced) Mailing List Archive: Netapp: toasters Cleaning up snapvault relationships.
I have manually re-created the qtree, but then I get the message that the qtree is not in a snapvaulted status. Parent topic: Data protection using SnapVault Copyright © 1994-2008, NetApp, Inc. Index | Next | Previous | Print Thread | View Threaded jeff.cleverley at avagotech May11,2012,4:40PM Post #1 of 2 (7218 views) Permalink Cleaning up snapvault relationships. This snapshot contains the 20GB of data in /vol/dstvol/dstqtree that was replicated over by QSM.dstfiler> snap list dstvol Volume dstvolworking... %/used%/ total date name----------------------------------------25% ( 25%)10% ( 10%)Aug 20 16:00nightly.0On the
Including: options snapvault.enable off snapvault stop WATLEANAS0001:/vol/vol_remote2/watmanfps0001_d__ snapvault convert WATLEANAS0001:/vol/vol_remote2/watmanfps0001_d__ Has anyone got any ideas. How can you remove this? It turned out that some of the qtree relationships did not get deleted and cleaned up.