You must not work with the public much. -- Trilby----How to Ask Questions the Smart Way Offline #7 2011-11-03 02:25:57 truebuilder Member Registered: 2011-11-02 Posts: 12 Re: [SOLVED] startx --> (EE) I'm going to just enjoy using Arch for a while but also lurk around the forums (perhaps something I know can be useful, payback & payforward both). Apparently fbdev is just not necessary, ditto ati.I like a full-feature desktop, but Gnome 3 refused (no doubt balking at my fossil video card), and Gnome 2 seemed kinda rough around Offline #23 2011-11-12 15:05:42 Gusar Member Registered: 2009-08-25 Posts: 3,502 Re: [SOLVED] startx --> (EE) Failed to load module "mach64" ... "vesa" ... this content
HD3450 HD3850 I can use the first one out of the box.. Offline #5 2011-11-02 21:16:21 Gusar Member Registered: 2009-08-25 Posts: 3,502 Re: [SOLVED] startx --> (EE) Failed to load module "mach64" ... "vesa" ... Editing the first post (and I'm logged in...) allows me to change the "Message" but not the "Subject". (BTW, this is a "Quick post" rather than my normal "Post Reply"). Benchmarks I'm testing this card on an Asus VL/I-486SV2GX4 revision 2.1 mobo. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=129552
You can adjust resolution and refresh rates. 6) This is a slightly newer version to the one that appears on the Windows 95 CD-ROM. truebuilder wrote:Yup! The subject line is full and the browser will not accept additional keystrokes. I'll look forward to future updates (yourself or others) on this developing thread.
Then run the software in list #2 above, to upgrade the driver. From the ArchWiki entry for Mach64 I gathered that all I had to do was pacman -S xf86-video-mach64, and that's all I did.That bought me a slightly different output; the only I'm satisfied in all particulars except mildly mystified as to why this is called "10-monitor.conf" (mine now looks more like a 10-videodriver.conf ). Open Dev Dri Card0 No Such File Or Directory Candidate "Device" section "Card1" >>>(WW) ATI: PCI Mach64 in slot 1:5:0 could not be detected ! ...(II) R128: Driver for ATI Rage 128 chipsets: ATI Rage 128 RE ( PCI ...
Edit (54.3 KiB, text/plain) I did an test today - took the harddisk (with debian unstable) from the other, working machine, plugged it into the new machine, booted, adjusted BusID parameters perbh ---Work is light so far, so I've run the lspci -k as you requested (thank you for the participation), and thrown in a dmesg for good measure:(Arch) dmesg(Arch) lspci -kHowever, So here are the same plus Xorg.0.log for a successful boot with Lubuntu Desktop 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot:(Lubuntu) dmesg(Lubuntu) lspci -k(Lubuntu) Xorg.0.logWhen I compare the (previously posted, fails) (Arch) Xorg.0.log to the By contrast, the former seems to know enough to not attempt to load "fglrx", but fails on "ati" (module does not exist, 0) then all the rest.The Lubuntu logfile has this
There is no material that is knowingly illegal here. Xorg No Devices To Configure It also contains a monitor adjustment feature inside the Display properties area. It's later than the software in list #4 above. X-Vesa 1.02 (640x480x8 mode) = Report attached below.
Fatal server error: no screens found I suspect some IRQ, ports or memory ranges conflict, but unfortunately I am not capable to diagnose it further. http://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?t=28156 Arie Skliarouk (skliarie) wrote on 2008-11-27: #10 lspci -vv on machine with two ATI PCI cards Edit (9.9 KiB, text/plain) Xserver is not crashing in case of ATI, just gets stuck. Failed To Load Module Vesa Ubuntu So I'm going to suspect that my installation has diverged from "normal" (Who's to say what's normal..? ), and hit the Big Red Button, just do a fresh netinstall. Parse Vt Settings Cannot Open /dev/tty0 Your cache administrator is webmaster.
I then installed this driver (64W95101), and that fixed this problem. And me? I am starting to suspect the motherboard (MSI 865PE Neo3), as on other machine (ASUS P4S8X-X) I have similar configuration (also two ATI cards of slightly different type) and the dual-screen The only solution I'm aware of would be to use 2 NVIDIA cards (supported by the same version of the nvidia driver) with the proprietary driver. Xf86-video-ati
Last edited by Gusar (2011-11-05 17:25:25) Offline #11 2011-11-06 22:54:07 truebuilder Member Registered: 2011-11-02 Posts: 12 Re: [SOLVED] startx --> (EE) Failed to load module "mach64" ... "vesa" ... but both ways did not lead anywhere for now. I tried to compile xf86-video-mach64-6.8.1 (http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-mach64/snapshot/xf86-video-mach64-6.8.1.tar.bz2), but same error. Edit bug mail Other bug subscribers Subscribe someone else Bug attachments The xorg.conf in question (edit) The Xorg.0.log when both cards are in. (edit) The Xorg.0.log when only Mach64 card is
It also includes a new "settings" tab in the Control Panel system display properties area. how PCI devices are detected .Explain why some PCI devices are not detected or hang the computer.Explain how the ... I believe the problem was due to the driver software being buggy.
Bryce Harrington (bryce) on 2008-12-05 Changed in xserver-xorg-video-mach64: status: New → Confirmed Tormod Volden (tormodvolden) wrote on 2009-03-15: #17 There will probably not be any updated packages for Intrepid. Arie Skliarouk (skliarie) wrote on 2008-11-27: #5 Xorg.0.log when free nv driver is specified. There is however bug 311748 which looks similar. Mark as duplicate Convert to a question Link a related branch Link to CVE You are not directly subscribed to this bug's notifications.
When I press this "magic button", the screen always get centrered correctly. However, this 3.03 version does not contain the driver files, only the utilities. Arch Linux HomePackagesForumsWikiBugsAURDownload Index Rules Search Register Login You are not logged in. So many tinkerings, so little time.Thanks for your faith, Gusar.
It has an AMD DX4 120 MHz (write back) CPU in it, with 1 stick of 16MB FPM. Closing. I think I'll need to start prefixing all my requests for X logs with "uninstall xf86-video-vesa".Despite that, I think I got what I wanted: it seems one needs to explicitly specify but no screen, better, this happened when both screens did not show any screen at all..
Note lack of any nv specific drivers. To know or not to know ...... On the other side, when I tried to use only NVidia card I got following in the /var/log/Xorg.0.log: ... (--) NV: Found NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 at [email protected]:00:0 (II) resource ranges No devices detected . > > Fatal ...10/31/2006 · ...